The neoliberal world is in turmoil.
The economic ideology which has been a dominant feature of international
politics for several decades faces its biggest challenge to date with the
response to COVID-19. Neoliberalism in many countries, especially in the West,
has reached hegemonic status and it continues to have a profound impact on
developing world countries as well.
The emergence of neoliberalism onto the global stage in the
1970s and early 1980s was the result of decades of intellectual and ideological
development by right-wing academics and economists. The seminal meeting in the
formation of neoliberalism was the meeting at Mont Pelerin, Switzerland in
1947. This followed on from an earlier meeting at the Colloque Lippmann in
Paris in 1938. Presiding over the meeting was the leading right-wing economist
Friedrich von Hayek, who a few years earlier had published his most well-known
work, The Road to Serfdom. Alongside Hayek were the leading neoliberals
of the time including Hayek’s mentor and fellow Austrian economist Ludwig von
Mises, the Chicago economist Milton Friedman and the leading Ordoliberal
economist, Wilhelm Röpke. All the major schools of neoliberal thought were
represented at Mont Pelerin: the Austrian School, the Chicago School and the
Ordo School.
The Mont Pelerin gathering laid the foundations of the Mont
Pelerin Society, along with a statement
of six aims which gave an ideational basis to neoliberalism. Over
the decades that followed, Hayek and Friedman worked to establish a public
policy basis for what Friedman was already calling by 1951 “neo-liberalism”.
The ideas of neoliberalism were disseminated by academic research institutions
such as the Economics Department of the University of Chicago and leading
right-wing think tanks such as the Institute of Economic Affairs (IEA)
established in the United Kingdom in 1955.
What began to emerge therefore was the framework of an
international ideology which has become established as neoliberal hegemony.
Today that hegemony has been challenged by the global coronavirus crisis like
never before, as domestic governments extensively expand their intervention in
the economy to counter the public health crisis. Neoliberalism has faced
substantial challenges in the past, such as the North Atlantic Financial Crisis
of 2008. Back then the narrative was that neoliberalism was finished and that a
return to a more statist, if not Keynesian, economic order seemed likely. This
did not happen and instead a new phase of neoliberal austerity began with
unprecedented cuts to social welfare and public services.
This time must be different. There can be no going back to
austerity. Even leading British right-wing think tanks
appear to see that the writing is on the wall for austerity. What progressives
need to ensure is that a viable alternative replaces neoliberalism which places
the values of social justice, the common good, ethical economics and economic
democracy at its heart. To do this, there will need to be a project not too dissimilar
to the one which began to forge transatlantic neoliberalism at Mont Pelerin. In
the aftermath of the coronavirus crisis, there will need to be a consensus on
the left as to the form an alternative to neoliberalism should take. This will
inevitably include a gathering of leading progressive intellectuals. The likes
of Rutger Bregman, Mariana Mazzucato, Thomas Piketty, Ha-Joon Chang, Naomi Klein, Guy Standing and Amartya Sen would seem
like obvious candidates to provide the ideas to shape such an alternative.
What issues would a Mont Pelerin of the left need to resolve?
Firstly, how best to deliver social justice and a radical redistribution of
wealth from the richest to the poorest in society. One idea which has achieved
greater prominence since the current crisis began, is that of the universal
basic income (UBI). While UBI has committed supporters from the socialist left
to the libertarian right (even Friedman advocated a form of it with the
negative income tax), the real battleground will be around the form a UBI
takes, how generous it is and how it is funded. A libertarian model of flat
taxes and minimal welfare provision to deliver UBI would seem greatly
unpalatable to socialists, social democrats and social liberals.
Another issue that would need to be resolved is the politics
of ownership. Should key industries be nationalised and taken back into the
public sector? What role should there be for employee models of ownership,
profit-sharing and traditional worker cooperatives? Not to mention the reorganisation
of the firm as an institution with a view to making it more democratic and
accountable to both its workforce and customer base.
An overriding theme of any alternative to neoliberalism has
to be a commitment to ending that other major global crisis which risks the
stability of the world, the crisis of climate change. Ideas such as the Green
New Deal would help to facilitate a sustainable economy with a high reliance on
renewable energy sources built on solid Keynesian foundations. If the current
crisis has shown anything it is that the reckless pursuit of profit and growth
as being the only viable ends to the economy is hollow and even destructive.
There is more to an economy than just GDP. New measurements of the economy will
have to be adopted as well, perhaps those which measure levels of inequality
and wellbeing.
The international academic left will
have to bring together the multiple strands of thought which it advances
against neoliberalism into a single project with a multinational basis. What is
needed is a new form of progressive politics for the world of the twenty-first century,
just as social democracy and Keynesian social liberalism were well-placed to
effectively address the socioeconomic inequalities of the post-war era. A
post-Keynesian and progressive gathering similar to that at Mont Pelerin could
begin to usher in an effective and viable alternative to neoliberalism. The
ideas of such a programme could inform policy research in numerous academic
institutions and progressive think tanks around the world with the potential to
construct a new progressive hegemony. The old economic order is crumbling and
must be replaced by something more progressive and egalitarian than what went
before. There is no time to waste.
Bibliography
Birch, Kean
(2017) A Research Agenda for Neoliberalism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Publishing Limited.
Birch, Kean and Mykhnenko, Vlad
(eds.) The Rise and Fall of Neoliberalism.
London: Zed Books.
Friedman, Milton (1951)
“Neo-liberalism and its Prospects” in Farmand, 17 February 1951, pp.
89-93: https://miltonfriedman.hoover.org/friedman_images/Collections/2016c21/Farmand_02_17_1951.pdf.
Accessed: 25/05/2020.
The Guardian – (16/05/2020) “Rightwing thinktanks call time on age of
austerity”: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/may/16/thatcherite-thinktanks-back-increase-public-spending-in-lockdown.
Accessed: 25/05/2020.
Hayek, Friedrich von (2001) The
Road to Serfdom. Abingdon: Routledge.
Held, David (2004) Global
Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus.
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mirowski, Philip and Plehwe, Dieter
(2015) The Road from Mont Pelerin: The Making of the Neoliberal Thought
Collective. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Mont Pelerin Society – “Statement of Aims”: https://www.montpelerin.org/statement-of-aims/.
Accessed: 25/05/2020.
Peck, Jamie (2014) Constructions
of Neoliberal Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Steger, Manfred B. and Roy, Ravi K.
(2010) Neoliberalism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment